AI-generated (except my deck, which was created by skilled, paid
This Article argues that the Palsgraf perspective is mistaken and proposes a different moral picture of tort law’s normative substance and doctrinal structure. Tort law may be centrally concerned with “common morality,” rather than promoting the welfare of society at large.26 But torts are not relational legal wrongs, and their purpose is not to recognize or redress relational moral wrongs. Torts are remedial pigeonholes: legal liability rules that identify the complex conditions under which a defendant is morally liable to provide a plaintiff with compensation or other forms of remedial relief. Rather than recognizing a species of relational moral wrongdoing or interpersonal mistreatment, a tort such as negligence is a coarse doctrinal device that identifies instances of “moral wrongdoing for which the offender must pay,”27 whether or not he has treated the plaintiff wrongfully. Other torts identify forms of behavior that render a defendant liable to pay compensation for resulting injuries although he has not behaved wrongfully at all. In both negligence and the other torts, a defendant may be liable to compensate a plaintiff even if he has not wronged or mistreated her. Contra the Palsgraf perspective, relational moral wrongdoing is not the basis of remedial liability, either in ordinary morality or the law of torts.。关于这个话题，立即前往 WhatsApp 網頁版提供了深入分析
，详情可参考谷歌
currentTime: number; // Playback position in seconds。业内人士推荐官网作为进阶阅读
Ранее пассажирка авиакомпании Ryanair получила серьезные ожоги ног во время полета по вине перевозчика. 63-летняя Дениз Эллиотт попросила стюардессу принести ей кофе, однако крышек для пластиковых стаканов не оказалось в наличии.